Will U.S intervene in Kashmir territorial conflict ?




Recently, the relations between Pakistan and India have been deteriorated due to the clashes between Pakistani security forces and Indian soldiers in Kashmir. However, the ceasefire between two sides have been taken place yesterday morning along the Bhimber Gali sector of frontier Poonch district, about 185 km southwest of Srinagar city, the summer capital of Indian- controlled Kashmir. Pakistani prime minister Nawaz Sharif believes that if U.S intervenes in resolving Kashmir conflict, it will be settled easily and fairly since U.S is considered as the good strategic partner of Pakistan and the close economic partnership of India .

Historically, the Kashmir conflict has been considered as the longest and bloodiest territorial conflict in the world and it's also known as the core issue between these two nations. The depute had been emerged since 1947 after the decolonization of Great Britain from British-India, and this British-controlled land were also divided into two India and Pakistan along with the religious lines. Actually, Kashmir was a princely state, and it was claimed by both states even though it was a Muslim majority State. Most people believed that the Kashmir state should have been acceded to Pakistan. Because of the unclear territorial division of Kashmir, depute between these two nations has been remained unsettled since that time and caused thousands of people died.

In my point of view, Pakistani leader really needs the third party to involve mediating between his neighboring country and his Pakistan. Specifically, Pakistan might see the important role of the U.S in settling the territorial depute between two nations in Middle East Palestine and Israel recently. Besides seeing the vital role of U.S, both Pakistan and India have been known as the Nuclear power countries, and the rapid development of Indian nuclear bombs recently is to become the most dangerous thing for Pakistan if the depute remains unsolved.But will India agree and accept US’s mediation as Pakistan wanted?

Commonly, India will not agree to accept the U.S mediation and Indian leader believe that the involvement of the third party must be considered as the interference in the regional conflict and it must waste of time to seek for others to help. Furthermore, U.S ‘s intervention will also become a pressure for India, and India itself will lost its interest which gain from that conflict with Pakistan if U.S intervenes. Based on the bilateral relation between U.S-India, U.S will also reject seeking intervention from Pakistani leader since India has been a close partnership of U.S in term of politic, economic, and security. If U.S decides to take action and involve in this territorial conflict, it will deteriorate the diplomatic relations between U.S itself and India. Also U.S might take much more advantages from India than Pakistan since India is known as the newly super power in East Asia.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Assad: The Man Who Saves Syria?

Image
" During the war, you have to reduce the ship to the shore. You don't run away because there is a war unless Syrian people want you to leave. If I am the reason of the war, I will leave," Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad wants to be remembered as the man who saved Syria if his war-torn nation could strive to put an end to the bloodiest civil war. Iranian intelligence official was quoted as saying by Russian stated owned media Sputnik that President Assad has refused safe heaven provided by Tehran, where he could safely hide and command his army at home. But he stubbornly decided to stay in Damascus. In late February, US and Russia brokered a cessation of hostilities aimed to hinder fighting in Syria, paving the way for peace talks, but Assad's fate has still remained controversial since the West demands Assad to step down while Putin reiterates that Assad's future and Syrian internal affairs must be decided by Syrians
Read more

Why Vietnamese government tries to strictly control media rights?

Image
Historically, a fter decolonization of France from Vietnam in 1954, Vietnam was divided into two along 17 th parallel (North and South Vietnam) according to Geneva peace accord. The North Vietnam was ruled by communist leader, Ho Chi Minh , while the South was ruled by king Bao Dai. In 1955, G. Ngo Dinh Diem which was backed by the U.S. overthrew  the King Bao Dai and came to power as a president of the Republic of Vietnam. The involvement of the U.S. in Vietnam led to the “Second Indochina War” which known as Vietnam War. Due to many factors such as the anti-war protests, long bloodiest war, and massive spending on military intervention, Nixon Administration sought the way to end the war and decided to withdraw its troops from Vietnam by negotiating with North Vietnam and signing Paris Peace Accord in 1973. In 1975, North Vietnam troops, which led by communist leader Ho Chi Minh, won over the South, and seized control Saigon. Finally, North and South were officially unified
Read more

African Leaders Eye Xi's Deep Pocket ?

Image
After paying a state visit to Zimbabwe, China's Xi Jinping is attending the Afro-Sino summit in Johannesburg, South Africa, where there is the gathering of around 40 heads of states and governments of the country members of African Union. During the address at the summit, President Xi unveils new measures, including financial package of $60 billion to empower African countries and support the development process. China is regarded as not only the largest trading partner of Africa but also generous and prominent donor. For many years, China has funded various development projects in Africa, aiming to help African countries boost the infrastructure, telecommunications, energy, and medical system. Regrading security sector, this rising power also tries to take a role as a peace maker helping stabilize the region. Late last year, China sent hundreds of its combat forces to join the peace keeping operation for the first time in South Sudan under the mandate of United N
Read more